The Royals' Fear of the Unknown Strikes Again
Written by Clark Fosler   
Thursday, 01 October 2009 08:59

Welcome to the end of yet another losing season in Kansas City and, almost predictably, the end of another season with more questions than answers.

Logic would dictate that either you are competing for a playoff berth or finding out what you have to do in order to compete the next year.    The best I can tell, however, is that the Royals do not subscribe to this theory.

Whether it was Ryan Shealy languishing in Omaha last year as Ross Gload slugged his way into the lineup at first base everyday or Kila Kaaihue getting just 24 plate appearances in the month of September, the Royals seem almost fearful to find out if position players can actually play.

Instead of seeing two more months of Shealy and a month of Kaaihue, Dayton Moore decided instead to leave both of those players as question marks, go out and trade a young reliever for a 'known commoditiy' in whiff artist Mike Jacobs.  

The Moore regime is not the only hierarchy to have a fear of the unknown.   His predecessor, Allard Baird and manager Buddy Bell pretty much refused to give a young player a shot.   We all remember a once highly regarded prospect in Justin Huber sitting on the bench in the majors for a month while aging Doug Mientkiewicz toiled at first base.   However, how many remember Matt Diaz in 2005?

Diaz was given 34 games (22 starts) over four months that season and hit a respectable 281/323/7404.  In September, the Royals gave him just six starts on the way to 100 losses, but he had two hits in three of them.  Not enough to warrant everyday duty at the end of a losing season and certainly not enough to get a shot in spring training the next year.

Instead, Diaz ended up in Atlanta where, over the past four seasons, he has compiled an OPS+ of 116 and a batting line of .316/.363/.466.   How's that look in your outfield Royals' fans?

The point of all of the above, is not whether Diaz, Huber, Shealy and Kaaihue can or could play.   The point was that the Royals simply had no logical reason to not find out for themselves, over an extended amount of playing time, whether they could or not.

I bring this up today, because a similar situation has developed in 2009.   As this team has ground its way deep into the ninety loss realm once more, they have a relatively young switch-hitting catcher who struggles to get playing time away from two very known commodities.

Of course, I am speaking of Brayan Pena, who has appeared in 61 games, but started only 37 of those and just 24 behind the plate.  Despite a .272/.329/.449 line and an OPS+ of 102, Pena has mostly sat and watched as Miguel Olivo and John Buck have taken all but five of the September catching starts.

The company line out of Royalsville is that the club believes Pena can get on base, but worry about his defensive ability.   So, of course, it makes perfect sense to simply not play him behind the plate for a month at the end of a disastrous season, doesn't it?!!

Sure, Miguel Olivo has a career high 23 home runs and with a current line of .249/.292/.492 is surpassing his career averages across the board, but not by a ton.  If you compare Miguel's 2009 to the two seasons he was Florida's everyday catcher (2006 and 2007) you will see fewer doubles and more home runs, but basically similar numbers.   Essentially, Olivo is how we thought he was - it is not like the Royals are gleaning some valuable insight into Olivo as this point.

Yes, John Buck has had a nice September and, with a career best line of .242/.294/.484 seems to be a guy who is much better as a backup catcher than an everyday guy.   Still, John carries a career line of .235/.298/.406: nothing new there, either.

So, that brings us back to Brayan Pena, who certainly appearsto be able to hit for a higher average and get on-base at a higher rate than either Olivo or Buck.   If you extrapolate his numbers out to a 500 plate appearance season, Brayan would, in theory, give you 28 doubles and 17 home runs:  nice numbers for a catcher who is probably going to get on base at a .320/.330 clip.

Of course, the Royals still do not know if Pena can handle a pitching staff everyday, throw out runners with any consistency and block the plate reasonably.   They do not know because Brayan has been granted TWENTY-FOUR starts at catcher since June.

It does not matter if Olivo and Buck have been hot.  It does not matter if you think Pena probably cannot be an everyday catcher.   Heck, if the Royals had played Brayan full time for three months and he ended up hitting .221 with 15 passed balls, we would have at least known what the Royals had in one Brayan Pena.

Instead, the Royals enter the last three games of the season fighting a bad Cleveland team for last place in the Central Division.  They do so with yet one more unanswered question.   Business as usual in KC.

 



Digg! Reddit! Facebook! Technorati! StumbleUpon! BallHype: hype it up!

Comments

avatar Peter
0
 
 
So the R's brass will potentially sit a guy who might play suspect defense (we don't know for sure since he hasn't been given a chance to play enough), but has a good shot at being an extremely good offensive catcher, yet they will play someone every day at SS who is the worst defensive SS in the league and can't get on base to save his life? Logical.
B
i
u
Quote
Code
List
List item
URL
Name *
Code   
Submit Comment
Cancel
avatar Clark Fosler
0
 
 
Not to mention batting Mike Jacobs fourth all month and not calling up Kaaihue. Perfect sense.
B
i
u
Quote
Code
List
List item
URL
Name *
Code   
Submit Comment
Cancel
avatar Toby V
0
 
 
How many times are the Royals going to get burned on making judgement about a player based on a Hot Sept? At some point don't you have to look at the full year of the player and years past? We went into this year - giving K. Davies a spot in the rotation based off a good Sept. A. Gordon - Had a good Sept, so they thought he had it all figured out. I don't doubt that Tejada is going to get a spot in the rotation next year, based off this Sept and then come May or June we will be talking about how bad is control is. (Big suprise - same problem he's had his whole life.)
B
i
u
Quote
Code
List
List item
URL
Name *
Code   
Submit Comment
Cancel
avatar Toby
0
 
 
Also, in regards to our Pena, Buck, and Olivo. I've watched most every game this year and I don't sit there when Pena plays and say "Man, this guy is terrible on defense compaired to Buck and Olivo." Buck has no arm, but calls a good game. Olivo has an arm, but can't block anything. I think I'd rather take my chances with Pena on Defense just to have the bat in the lineup. I think on offense with a full season - he could have better numbers then Buck and Olivo. (Maybe not as may HRs, but close.)
B
i
u
Quote
Code
List
List item
URL
Name *
Code   
Submit Comment
Cancel
avatar Munson
0
 
 
The only thing I can figure out is that the Royals are afraid of last place. They want to win as many games as possible. And while I guess this is an admirable goal, and I do like it better when they win than when they lose, I think this kind of attitude hurts them in the long run. I remember reading somewhere recently (ESPN.com maybe) that the Royals upper management has not allowed for trade deadline deals so that they can avoid the 100 loss plateau. It has worked the last two years, but I think it has really hurt our chances for the next several years. For instance, what would we have gotten if we had traded Meche at the trading deadline last year? Or if we had traded Bannister at the deadline this year? Perhaps Moore really did get only crappy offers for each of them. But then again...
B
i
u
Quote
Code
List
List item
URL
Name *
Code   
Submit Comment
Cancel
avatar Dan S.
0
 
 
Great point Clark. I'd be willing to bet Callaspo would have been handled the same way if not for injuries to other players.

B
i
u
Quote
Code
List
List item
URL
Name *
Code   
Submit Comment
Cancel
avatar J Peterman
0
 
 
I'm sorry, but why should Kila been called up? He hit 250 with minimal power this season and slumped badly towards the end of the season. What message would that send to guys who improved instead of regressed this year? I'm not saying all is right with the decisions being made, but can we please stop focusing on a guy who had 57 RBI in 131 games this season.
B
i
u
Quote
Code
List
List item
URL
Name *
Code   
Submit Comment
Cancel
avatar kcghost
0
 
 
The Royals front office is a total embarrassment. They are incredibly arrogant for a group that simply has no ability to judge major league talent.
B
i
u
Quote
Code
List
List item
URL
Name *
Code   
Submit Comment
Cancel
avatar Clark Fosler
0
 
 
Toby - I agree with you completely on your observations of the three catchers. Maybe we need Dr. Frankenstein to combine all three into one really good catcher.

J.Peterman - two reasons for a Kaaihure callup. One, despite a .250 average, he posted a .392 on-base percentage. Two, you have an arbitration decision on Mike Jacobs coming up - wouldn't it make sense to find out of Kila can give you at least Jacobs-level production at a fifth the price?
B
i
u
Quote
Code
List
List item
URL
Name *
Code   
Submit Comment
Cancel
avatar J Peterman
0
 
 
Clark- So, Mike Jacobs stinks, but if Kila can produce like Mike Jacobs at 1/5 the price that'd be kosher? David Glass spent some money, the guy stinks, but...if we go cheap and get the same production, that's a plus? It's the same cycle over and over for the Royals, its the Twilight Zone.
B
i
u
Quote
Code
List
List item
URL
Name *
Code   
Submit Comment
Cancel
avatar Unknown Royals Fan
0
 
 
B
i
u
Quote
Code
List
List item
URL
Name *
Code   
Submit Comment
Cancel
B
i
u
Quote
Code
List
List item
URL
Name *
Code   
Submit Comment
 

Search

Latest Forum Posts

Rule 5 Update
by cfos 2009/12/10 08:06
Brad Thompson...
by cfos 2009/11/19 11:11
Re:Meche Likely Done For The Year
by cfos 2009/09/10 12:56
Re:Meche Likely Done For The Year
by cbrown 2009/09/10 11:50
Meche Likely Done For The Year
by Craig Brown 2009/09/10 11:35

About Bloguin

Bloguin is the revolutionary blog network specifically focused on helping bloggers get the most out of their websites. We're currently working on building a large network of online communities and hope to expand our blogging coverage to include a wide range of topics.

Advertisers

The Bloguin Network allows advertisers to promote their products and services to our ever-growing number of visitors. We offer both site-specific ad placements as well as the ability to run a network-wide campaign. If you're interested in working with Bloguin to meet your advertising needs, please contact us.

Bloggers Wanted

The Bloguin Network is always looking to expand. We're specifically looking for blogs in the sports, entertainment, and video games field, but are open to adding any type of quality site.. If you're a blogger and interested in joining our network, please fill out our application form.

The Bloguin Login

The Bloguin Login gives you full access to everything our network has to offer. Your name and password will work for each and every one of our sites. Signing up is simple, and will allow you to post in all our forums, create member blogs, and access other cool features! What are you waiting for? Create an Account!