<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bold Flavors</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.royalsauthority.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=4576" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.royalsauthority.com/?p=4576</link>
	<description>Deconstructing The Process</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 01:09:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://www.royalsauthority.com/?p=4576&#038;cpage=1#comment-10135</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 20:28:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.royalsauthority.com/?p=4576#comment-10135</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m not sure Mike Maddux will leave Texas.  Why would you leave a team that was just in the world series?   Yes I am assuming they make it.   Mike probably won&#039;t leave, but would Greg?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure Mike Maddux will leave Texas.  Why would you leave a team that was just in the world series?   Yes I am assuming they make it.   Mike probably won&#8217;t leave, but would Greg?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bellwether Johnson</title>
		<link>http://www.royalsauthority.com/?p=4576&#038;cpage=1#comment-10132</link>
		<dc:creator>Bellwether Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 14:09:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.royalsauthority.com/?p=4576#comment-10132</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It didn&#039;t help that Eiland started his interview by saying &quot;Feel like I drank about a thousand beers last night, you guys&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It didn&#8217;t help that Eiland started his interview by saying &#8220;Feel like I drank about a thousand beers last night, you guys&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle</title>
		<link>http://www.royalsauthority.com/?p=4576&#038;cpage=1#comment-10131</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 13:45:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.royalsauthority.com/?p=4576#comment-10131</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Eiland doesn&#039;t really excite me much, but I can&#039;t think of any pitching coaches available.  Would Mike Maddux leave Texas?  Who is the Rays pitching coach?  I don&#039;t think those guys are available, but just maybe.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eiland doesn&#8217;t really excite me much, but I can&#8217;t think of any pitching coaches available.  Would Mike Maddux leave Texas?  Who is the Rays pitching coach?  I don&#8217;t think those guys are available, but just maybe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle</title>
		<link>http://www.royalsauthority.com/?p=4576&#038;cpage=1#comment-10130</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 13:41:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.royalsauthority.com/?p=4576#comment-10130</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That was a nice piece over at 1-70.  Very detailed.  I don&#039;t understand why Wood and Collins were used so much.  I think that SB are more valuable than the &quot;advanced&quot; stats give them credit for.  I don&#039;t know about you guys, but if they are in the low to mid 70% range then they are a positive.

The only thing that would be wrong with having Laffey on the 40 man is if he is blocking someone that needs to be protected.  Luckily there isn&#039;t much that needs to be protected.  I think Sisk, and maybe Hardy are the only two that HAVE to be added to be protected from the Rule 5.  But if I&#039;m missing somebody, let me know.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was a nice piece over at 1-70.  Very detailed.  I don&#8217;t understand why Wood and Collins were used so much.  I think that SB are more valuable than the &#8220;advanced&#8221; stats give them credit for.  I don&#8217;t know about you guys, but if they are in the low to mid 70% range then they are a positive.</p>
<p>The only thing that would be wrong with having Laffey on the 40 man is if he is blocking someone that needs to be protected.  Luckily there isn&#8217;t much that needs to be protected.  I think Sisk, and maybe Hardy are the only two that HAVE to be added to be protected from the Rule 5.  But if I&#8217;m missing somebody, let me know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DanL</title>
		<link>http://www.royalsauthority.com/?p=4576&#038;cpage=1#comment-10128</link>
		<dc:creator>DanL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 12:24:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.royalsauthority.com/?p=4576#comment-10128</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Your Laffey analysis matched my thinking exactly. Why not claim somebody when you get a chance - your not promising him a 2012 roster spot, not even a spring training invite. He gives Dayton options in the off-season.

The best part of the signing was the release of Jesse - never thought much of his ability. So if Laffey holds #40, my bottom roster slots are: (guys who are likely to be bumped for a variety of reasons).
#40 Laffey (insurance policy)
#39 Francis (free agency)
#38 Chen (free agency)
#37 Getz (not versatile enough to be backup)
#36 Bianchi (others have passed him)
#35 Maier (out of options, make room for Cain)
#34 Dyson (better offensive OF options)
#33 CRobinson (blocked player, traded late in spring training)

What is your bottom list?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your Laffey analysis matched my thinking exactly. Why not claim somebody when you get a chance &#8211; your not promising him a 2012 roster spot, not even a spring training invite. He gives Dayton options in the off-season.</p>
<p>The best part of the signing was the release of Jesse &#8211; never thought much of his ability. So if Laffey holds #40, my bottom roster slots are: (guys who are likely to be bumped for a variety of reasons).<br />
#40 Laffey (insurance policy)<br />
#39 Francis (free agency)<br />
#38 Chen (free agency)<br />
#37 Getz (not versatile enough to be backup)<br />
#36 Bianchi (others have passed him)<br />
#35 Maier (out of options, make room for Cain)<br />
#34 Dyson (better offensive OF options)<br />
#33 CRobinson (blocked player, traded late in spring training)</p>
<p>What is your bottom list?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
