<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Winter Meeting Dispatch</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.royalsauthority.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=4715" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.royalsauthority.com/?p=4715</link>
	<description>Deconstructing The Process</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 08:06:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jim fetterolf</title>
		<link>http://www.royalsauthority.com/?p=4715&#038;cpage=1#comment-11395</link>
		<dc:creator>jim fetterolf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 03:16:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.royalsauthority.com/?p=4715#comment-11395</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Craig, any ideas of how to compare value of position players to pitchers?  fWAR doesn&#039;t seem universally accepted.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Craig, any ideas of how to compare value of position players to pitchers?  fWAR doesn&#8217;t seem universally accepted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.royalsauthority.com/?p=4715&#038;cpage=1#comment-11384</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 19:48:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.royalsauthority.com/?p=4715#comment-11384</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cahill would be amazing, I&#039;ll order my jersey the day that gets announced. Wishful thinking.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cahill would be amazing, I&#8217;ll order my jersey the day that gets announced. Wishful thinking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jim fetterolf</title>
		<link>http://www.royalsauthority.com/?p=4715&#038;cpage=1#comment-11371</link>
		<dc:creator>jim fetterolf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 17:00:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.royalsauthority.com/?p=4715#comment-11371</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;seems like a solid block on Wil Myers.&quot;

Not sure Myers is advanced enough to be considered blocked.  I assume he starts at Springdale next season and can earn his way up to Omaha, then starts &#039;13 at Omaha in line for a Moose-type promotion during the season.  By then trades, injuries,or declining production may open a spot.  Cain doesn&#039;t have a long track record, both Frenchy and Gordon are coming off career years that they may not be able to repeat, and all the incumbents are quite a bit older than Myers in baseball years, so Myers may be less blocked than protected from having his development rushed like happened with Gordon and maybe Moose.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;seems like a solid block on Wil Myers.&#8221;</p>
<p>Not sure Myers is advanced enough to be considered blocked.  I assume he starts at Springdale next season and can earn his way up to Omaha, then starts &#8217;13 at Omaha in line for a Moose-type promotion during the season.  By then trades, injuries,or declining production may open a spot.  Cain doesn&#8217;t have a long track record, both Frenchy and Gordon are coming off career years that they may not be able to repeat, and all the incumbents are quite a bit older than Myers in baseball years, so Myers may be less blocked than protected from having his development rushed like happened with Gordon and maybe Moose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Loyal Royal</title>
		<link>http://www.royalsauthority.com/?p=4715&#038;cpage=1#comment-11352</link>
		<dc:creator>Loyal Royal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 15:01:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.royalsauthority.com/?p=4715#comment-11352</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@ DanL -

I think Frenchy&#039;s 2yr deal was more of an insurance policy than a blocking of Myers.  If he can replicate his 2011 season and Royals are contending then he stays in RF...Myers gets additional seasoning in the minors. He&#039;s in a similar position as Cain was last yr.  The plan was to call him up, but because of the yr&#039;s Gordon, Melky and Frenchy had it was unjustified.

If Frenchy or Cain or the Royals flop (god forbid if all 3 do) in 2012 then Frenchy will be flipped to a contender and Myers get&#039;s a chance to earn his stripes with a mid-season call in a similar fashion to Hosmer &amp; Moose.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ DanL -</p>
<p>I think Frenchy&#8217;s 2yr deal was more of an insurance policy than a blocking of Myers.  If he can replicate his 2011 season and Royals are contending then he stays in RF&#8230;Myers gets additional seasoning in the minors. He&#8217;s in a similar position as Cain was last yr.  The plan was to call him up, but because of the yr&#8217;s Gordon, Melky and Frenchy had it was unjustified.</p>
<p>If Frenchy or Cain or the Royals flop (god forbid if all 3 do) in 2012 then Frenchy will be flipped to a contender and Myers get&#8217;s a chance to earn his stripes with a mid-season call in a similar fashion to Hosmer &amp; Moose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DanL</title>
		<link>http://www.royalsauthority.com/?p=4715&#038;cpage=1#comment-11351</link>
		<dc:creator>DanL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 14:13:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.royalsauthority.com/?p=4715#comment-11351</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Glad to see Yam get traded - didn&#039;t understand why Boston valued Aviles over Yam, and then why Yam didn&#039;t get a real shot in KC - something behind the scenes with that guy. So getting two minors for Yam is a good deal.

If Gordon gets 4 years and Frenchy has the next 2 years in RF, seems like a solid block on Wil Myers. It&#039;s not like Wil can switch to DH/3B/1B/C, so somebody has to get traded when Wil is ready later this year. I&#039;m going to guess Wil is the trade bait for a front line pitcher at some point - there seems to be a higher value placed on the unproven prospect than a young veteren.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad to see Yam get traded &#8211; didn&#8217;t understand why Boston valued Aviles over Yam, and then why Yam didn&#8217;t get a real shot in KC &#8211; something behind the scenes with that guy. So getting two minors for Yam is a good deal.</p>
<p>If Gordon gets 4 years and Frenchy has the next 2 years in RF, seems like a solid block on Wil Myers. It&#8217;s not like Wil can switch to DH/3B/1B/C, so somebody has to get traded when Wil is ready later this year. I&#8217;m going to guess Wil is the trade bait for a front line pitcher at some point &#8211; there seems to be a higher value placed on the unproven prospect than a young veteren.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jim fetterolf</title>
		<link>http://www.royalsauthority.com/?p=4715&#038;cpage=1#comment-11346</link>
		<dc:creator>jim fetterolf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 05:29:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.royalsauthority.com/?p=4715#comment-11346</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Make that 4 years/$30 million, about a Billy deal, as I remember.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Make that 4 years/$30 million, about a Billy deal, as I remember.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jim fetterolf</title>
		<link>http://www.royalsauthority.com/?p=4715&#038;cpage=1#comment-11342</link>
		<dc:creator>jim fetterolf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 04:31:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.royalsauthority.com/?p=4715#comment-11342</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yam Navarro traded for two minor-leaguers, roster at 39 players before tomorrow&#039;s Rule 5 draft.

On Gordon, maybe it was Dutton who suggested that they are close for four years/$20 million.  Seems reasonable.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yam Navarro traded for two minor-leaguers, roster at 39 players before tomorrow&#8217;s Rule 5 draft.</p>
<p>On Gordon, maybe it was Dutton who suggested that they are close for four years/$20 million.  Seems reasonable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Loyal Royal</title>
		<link>http://www.royalsauthority.com/?p=4715&#038;cpage=1#comment-11340</link>
		<dc:creator>Loyal Royal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 03:09:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.royalsauthority.com/?p=4715#comment-11340</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This just on MLBRumors...

Royals Exploring Long-Term Extension For Gordon
By Luke Adams [December 7 at 8:58pm CST]

Following a break-out campaign that earned Alex Gordon MVP votes, the Royals would like to lock up the 27-year-old for the long term. The Royals have discussed a contract extension for Gordon, and GM Dayton Moore says the club will work &quot;very hard&quot; to keep him in Kansas City, according to MLB.com&#039;s Dick Kaegel.

&quot;I don&#039;t think either side feels any pressure,&quot; said Moore. &quot;We have him under control for two more years. There&#039;s certainly a willingness to move forward together and get something done.&quot;

Gordon, who hit .303/.376/.502 in 2011, will be eligible for arbitration this year and next. MLBTR projects an approximate salary of $4.4MM for the former second overall pick.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This just on MLBRumors&#8230;</p>
<p>Royals Exploring Long-Term Extension For Gordon<br />
By Luke Adams [December 7 at 8:58pm CST]</p>
<p>Following a break-out campaign that earned Alex Gordon MVP votes, the Royals would like to lock up the 27-year-old for the long term. The Royals have discussed a contract extension for Gordon, and GM Dayton Moore says the club will work &#8220;very hard&#8221; to keep him in Kansas City, according to MLB.com&#8217;s Dick Kaegel.</p>
<p>&#8220;I don&#8217;t think either side feels any pressure,&#8221; said Moore. &#8220;We have him under control for two more years. There&#8217;s certainly a willingness to move forward together and get something done.&#8221;</p>
<p>Gordon, who hit .303/.376/.502 in 2011, will be eligible for arbitration this year and next. MLBTR projects an approximate salary of $4.4MM for the former second overall pick.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig Brown</title>
		<link>http://www.royalsauthority.com/?p=4715&#038;cpage=1#comment-11338</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 02:04:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.royalsauthority.com/?p=4715#comment-11338</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pythag isn&#039;t a good predictor. It should really be used to measure past performance.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pythag isn&#8217;t a good predictor. It should really be used to measure past performance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jim fetterolf</title>
		<link>http://www.royalsauthority.com/?p=4715&#038;cpage=1#comment-11337</link>
		<dc:creator>jim fetterolf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 21:59:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.royalsauthority.com/?p=4715#comment-11337</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;@Jim Any projection of 10-15 more wins based only on the position player side of the equation is wildly optimistic.&quot;

I also named four pitchers no longer with us who accounted for a sizable number of losses.  Sanchez and Paulino seem clear upgrades over any of those four pitchers.

&quot;Our 2011 pythag was 78-84… it’s no great stretch to think we can improve our talent level systematically and top 83 wins.&quot;

I don&#039;t care for pythag, but 83 wins is reasonable enough.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;@Jim Any projection of 10-15 more wins based only on the position player side of the equation is wildly optimistic.&#8221;</p>
<p>I also named four pitchers no longer with us who accounted for a sizable number of losses.  Sanchez and Paulino seem clear upgrades over any of those four pitchers.</p>
<p>&#8220;Our 2011 pythag was 78-84… it’s no great stretch to think we can improve our talent level systematically and top 83 wins.&#8221;</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t care for pythag, but 83 wins is reasonable enough.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
