<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 40 Man Roster Review &#8211; Aaron Crow</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.royalsauthority.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=4832" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.royalsauthority.com/?p=4832</link>
	<description>Deconstructing The Process</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 01:09:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jim fetterolf</title>
		<link>http://www.royalsauthority.com/?p=4832&#038;cpage=1#comment-12374</link>
		<dc:creator>jim fetterolf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 05:28:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.royalsauthority.com/?p=4832#comment-12374</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;but are you really suggesting that striking batters out and limiting walks are somehow ethereal conjectures?&quot;

No, just teasing Axl a little. Been looking at pitching and note that there are two statistical categories that most #1 starters have in common, high net K/9 and high innings per start.  The fact that Paulino, Sanchez, and Duffy all miss bats and can dial up a punch-out when needed is part of my reason for optimism this season and part of why I think those three are significant upgrades over Francis, Davies, and SOS/Mazzaro. The drawback to missing bats, as we see with those three, is that too often the K comes on a six, seven, or eight pitch at-bat. When looking at Ks, K/GS is also a useful number. I remember a Duffy start when he punched out eight or nine batters, walked four or five, left the game after the 4th inning behind by three or four runs. His K/9 was breath taking, his net K/9 wasn&#039;t bad, but not making it past the 6th or 7th inning misses half of what it takes to be an effective starter. Master Chen doesn&#039;t miss a lot of bats, yet he manages to pitch effectively, likely because six pitches from three arm angles makes it hard to get good wood on the ball.

&quot;In your opinion, is HR/9 somehow less “real” an evaluation than simply saying “the guy keeps the ball in the yard”?&quot;

Semantics, although I&#039;m surprised that HR/9 is given weight, thinking it is more a luck sort of thing, just a fly ball a little longer and better placed. HR/9 is a suggestion that stats will move toward the recognition that all Balls in Play are not created equally, which will lead, with FieldFX, to breaking down LD, GB, and FB into smaller chunks of data based on velocity and vector relative to placement of fielders, which will show whether a pitcher is getting squared up or fooling hitters and hitting his spots.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;but are you really suggesting that striking batters out and limiting walks are somehow ethereal conjectures?&#8221;</p>
<p>No, just teasing Axl a little. Been looking at pitching and note that there are two statistical categories that most #1 starters have in common, high net K/9 and high innings per start.  The fact that Paulino, Sanchez, and Duffy all miss bats and can dial up a punch-out when needed is part of my reason for optimism this season and part of why I think those three are significant upgrades over Francis, Davies, and SOS/Mazzaro. The drawback to missing bats, as we see with those three, is that too often the K comes on a six, seven, or eight pitch at-bat. When looking at Ks, K/GS is also a useful number. I remember a Duffy start when he punched out eight or nine batters, walked four or five, left the game after the 4th inning behind by three or four runs. His K/9 was breath taking, his net K/9 wasn&#8217;t bad, but not making it past the 6th or 7th inning misses half of what it takes to be an effective starter. Master Chen doesn&#8217;t miss a lot of bats, yet he manages to pitch effectively, likely because six pitches from three arm angles makes it hard to get good wood on the ball.</p>
<p>&#8220;In your opinion, is HR/9 somehow less “real” an evaluation than simply saying “the guy keeps the ball in the yard”?&#8221;</p>
<p>Semantics, although I&#8217;m surprised that HR/9 is given weight, thinking it is more a luck sort of thing, just a fly ball a little longer and better placed. HR/9 is a suggestion that stats will move toward the recognition that all Balls in Play are not created equally, which will lead, with FieldFX, to breaking down LD, GB, and FB into smaller chunks of data based on velocity and vector relative to placement of fielders, which will show whether a pitcher is getting squared up or fooling hitters and hitting his spots.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin F</title>
		<link>http://www.royalsauthority.com/?p=4832&#038;cpage=1#comment-12369</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin F</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 01:42:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.royalsauthority.com/?p=4832#comment-12369</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I really think Crow&#039;s success as a starter hinges more on commanding his two plus pitches than on developing a good change up. He gets such good movement on his slider and two seamer (which break in opposite directions) that when he pitches ahead in the count the hitters become very defensive.

A decent changeup would definitely help him get thru the lineup the third time around but if he&#039;s not throwing the fastball and slider for strikes he won&#039;t be around long enough to worry about that.

Jonathan Sanchez is similarly a two pitch pitcher for the most part with a splitter/change that he throws a handful of times to keep the hitters honest. Same deal with him: when he&#039;s throwing strikes his two plus pitches are enough to get by, even dominate.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really think Crow&#8217;s success as a starter hinges more on commanding his two plus pitches than on developing a good change up. He gets such good movement on his slider and two seamer (which break in opposite directions) that when he pitches ahead in the count the hitters become very defensive.</p>
<p>A decent changeup would definitely help him get thru the lineup the third time around but if he&#8217;s not throwing the fastball and slider for strikes he won&#8217;t be around long enough to worry about that.</p>
<p>Jonathan Sanchez is similarly a two pitch pitcher for the most part with a splitter/change that he throws a handful of times to keep the hitters honest. Same deal with him: when he&#8217;s throwing strikes his two plus pitches are enough to get by, even dominate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted</title>
		<link>http://www.royalsauthority.com/?p=4832&#038;cpage=1#comment-12368</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 01:16:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.royalsauthority.com/?p=4832#comment-12368</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As for win totals, I still think a 10-game jump is optimistic, but not overly so.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As for win totals, I still think a 10-game jump is optimistic, but not overly so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted</title>
		<link>http://www.royalsauthority.com/?p=4832&#038;cpage=1#comment-12367</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 01:14:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.royalsauthority.com/?p=4832#comment-12367</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Sacred K/9&quot; ... &quot;mystical peripherals&quot;.  Jim, are you serious?  I get that you are wary of &quot;new&quot; statistical analysis (in quotes because it is not really so new anymore, but the main stream discussion of it is relatively new), but are you really suggesting that striking batters out and limiting walks are somehow ethereal conjectures?  Because these are measurements of what have essentially been accepted wisdom in baseball for over a century:  limit base runners and you will be successful more often than not as a pitcher; be aggressive in the zone and limit walks; keep the ball down (that would roughly correlate to GB/FB); etc.  In your opinion, is HR/9 somehow less &quot;real&quot; an evaluation than simply saying &quot;the guy keeps the ball in the yard&quot;?

You seem to agree that these statistics provide some measure of a pitcher&#039;s ability, but you also want to turn your nose...I do not understand.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Sacred K/9&#8243; &#8230; &#8220;mystical peripherals&#8221;.  Jim, are you serious?  I get that you are wary of &#8220;new&#8221; statistical analysis (in quotes because it is not really so new anymore, but the main stream discussion of it is relatively new), but are you really suggesting that striking batters out and limiting walks are somehow ethereal conjectures?  Because these are measurements of what have essentially been accepted wisdom in baseball for over a century:  limit base runners and you will be successful more often than not as a pitcher; be aggressive in the zone and limit walks; keep the ball down (that would roughly correlate to GB/FB); etc.  In your opinion, is HR/9 somehow less &#8220;real&#8221; an evaluation than simply saying &#8220;the guy keeps the ball in the yard&#8221;?</p>
<p>You seem to agree that these statistics provide some measure of a pitcher&#8217;s ability, but you also want to turn your nose&#8230;I do not understand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jim fetterolf</title>
		<link>http://www.royalsauthority.com/?p=4832&#038;cpage=1#comment-12365</link>
		<dc:creator>jim fetterolf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 23:04:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.royalsauthority.com/?p=4832#comment-12365</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;would you bet they will win 81-85 games when in the Dayton era they havent came close?&quot;

Seems a reasonable bet. the 1st round draft picks have started playing; Hoch, Crow, Hoz, Moose, and Gordon, and Perez was a highly rated international signing, maybe Escobar was too. Gio was a 2nd rounder.

&quot;The pitching improvements are minor in my opinion when compared to being better than SOS/Mazarro/Davies.&quot;

And Francis.  The improvements all have the mystical peripherals.  Guess we could have traded the farm for Gio Gonzales and picked up another 0.9 fWAR while putting Duffy back in Omaha.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;would you bet they will win 81-85 games when in the Dayton era they havent came close?&#8221;</p>
<p>Seems a reasonable bet. the 1st round draft picks have started playing; Hoch, Crow, Hoz, Moose, and Gordon, and Perez was a highly rated international signing, maybe Escobar was too. Gio was a 2nd rounder.</p>
<p>&#8220;The pitching improvements are minor in my opinion when compared to being better than SOS/Mazarro/Davies.&#8221;</p>
<p>And Francis.  The improvements all have the mystical peripherals.  Guess we could have traded the farm for Gio Gonzales and picked up another 0.9 fWAR while putting Duffy back in Omaha.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Axl</title>
		<link>http://www.royalsauthority.com/?p=4832&#038;cpage=1#comment-12363</link>
		<dc:creator>Axl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 22:29:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.royalsauthority.com/?p=4832#comment-12363</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I understand the bullet points you send out..but at the same time, would you bet they will win 81-85 games when in the Dayton era they havent came close?  They are improving and their young offensive talent is awesome and very exciting. The pitching improvements are minor in my opinion when compared to being better than SOS/Mazarro/Davies.  When that is the floor, anyone is better but doesn&#039;t mean they can win either.

At what point as a fan will you at least hold the Royals with some accountability for not providing a winner.  Will you be disappointed if they dont win the division in the next 5 years or is that not enough time?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I understand the bullet points you send out..but at the same time, would you bet they will win 81-85 games when in the Dayton era they havent came close?  They are improving and their young offensive talent is awesome and very exciting. The pitching improvements are minor in my opinion when compared to being better than SOS/Mazarro/Davies.  When that is the floor, anyone is better but doesn&#8217;t mean they can win either.</p>
<p>At what point as a fan will you at least hold the Royals with some accountability for not providing a winner.  Will you be disappointed if they dont win the division in the next 5 years or is that not enough time?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jim fetterolf</title>
		<link>http://www.royalsauthority.com/?p=4832&#038;cpage=1#comment-12362</link>
		<dc:creator>jim fetterolf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 22:06:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.royalsauthority.com/?p=4832#comment-12362</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;the stats will continue.&quot;

Then by all means short the Royals, you&#039;ll get rich. Others of us see little use in anything before Glass actually bought the team and brought GMDM in.

&quot;Is KC all in 2013?&quot;

I hope we&#039;re never all in, that would mean the farm system had failed and we had to trade sustainability for a chance at instant gratification.

&quot;I’m shocked Dayton/Glass look at this rotation and think it can win 90.&quot;

Haven&#039;t seen that mentioned anywhere but by commentators on blogs. 90 is possible with some breaks, but 81-85 wins is the range I&#039;m seeing, reasonable considering 3/5ths of the rotation has been upgraded with guys who can miss bats and generate the sacred K/9, while the offense looks an improvement over the days of Getz, Aviles, and Treanor with Moose and Hoz having some experience and success to go with their talents.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;the stats will continue.&#8221;</p>
<p>Then by all means short the Royals, you&#8217;ll get rich. Others of us see little use in anything before Glass actually bought the team and brought GMDM in.</p>
<p>&#8220;Is KC all in 2013?&#8221;</p>
<p>I hope we&#8217;re never all in, that would mean the farm system had failed and we had to trade sustainability for a chance at instant gratification.</p>
<p>&#8220;I’m shocked Dayton/Glass look at this rotation and think it can win 90.&#8221;</p>
<p>Haven&#8217;t seen that mentioned anywhere but by commentators on blogs. 90 is possible with some breaks, but 81-85 wins is the range I&#8217;m seeing, reasonable considering 3/5ths of the rotation has been upgraded with guys who can miss bats and generate the sacred K/9, while the offense looks an improvement over the days of Getz, Aviles, and Treanor with Moose and Hoz having some experience and success to go with their talents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Axl</title>
		<link>http://www.royalsauthority.com/?p=4832&#038;cpage=1#comment-12360</link>
		<dc:creator>Axl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 19:47:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.royalsauthority.com/?p=4832#comment-12360</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Successful rotations either develop their own Verlanders, Hellickson&#039;s, etc or they spend in free agency/go the trade route.  KC picks in the top 10 year in and year out and can&#039;t seem to develop pitching (before you name the 5 prospects in AA/AAA that haven&#039;t thrown a MLB pitch yet) or even get lucky.  Since spending money is a no no and the rotation can only be filled by guys that were dfa&#039;d or our own missed picks...the stats will continue.  Bottom of the league in ERA, walks allowed, and strikeouts thrown.  Duffy has potential but was not be confused with dominant. 

Its amazing that not one pitcher in the last 15 years (minus Greinke who needed to go back down then come back up) with these high drafts couldn&#039;t be a Matt Moore, young Cole Hamels etc.  Crow is who he is now.  Someone who found a niche in the bullpen and will have to battle to get a rotation job now.  Nothing in KC land is easy.  Especially when you can&#039;t touch a Free Agent&#039;s asking price year in and year out...or refuse to.

Is KC all in 2013? 14?  As a competitor, I&#039;m shocked Dayton/Glass look at this rotation and think it can win 90.  I&#039;m sure they don&#039;t. If they want to win, eventually the rotation needs to be seriously addressed.  Not a playoff sniff since 1985 is embarrasing.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Successful rotations either develop their own Verlanders, Hellickson&#8217;s, etc or they spend in free agency/go the trade route.  KC picks in the top 10 year in and year out and can&#8217;t seem to develop pitching (before you name the 5 prospects in AA/AAA that haven&#8217;t thrown a MLB pitch yet) or even get lucky.  Since spending money is a no no and the rotation can only be filled by guys that were dfa&#8217;d or our own missed picks&#8230;the stats will continue.  Bottom of the league in ERA, walks allowed, and strikeouts thrown.  Duffy has potential but was not be confused with dominant. </p>
<p>Its amazing that not one pitcher in the last 15 years (minus Greinke who needed to go back down then come back up) with these high drafts couldn&#8217;t be a Matt Moore, young Cole Hamels etc.  Crow is who he is now.  Someone who found a niche in the bullpen and will have to battle to get a rotation job now.  Nothing in KC land is easy.  Especially when you can&#8217;t touch a Free Agent&#8217;s asking price year in and year out&#8230;or refuse to.</p>
<p>Is KC all in 2013? 14?  As a competitor, I&#8217;m shocked Dayton/Glass look at this rotation and think it can win 90.  I&#8217;m sure they don&#8217;t. If they want to win, eventually the rotation needs to be seriously addressed.  Not a playoff sniff since 1985 is embarrasing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted</title>
		<link>http://www.royalsauthority.com/?p=4832&#038;cpage=1#comment-12359</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 19:30:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.royalsauthority.com/?p=4832#comment-12359</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sorry, Grant Green.  And I think his stock has fallen a bit, right?  Anyway, point is, Crow was well regarded at the time of the draft, and even if he ends up a reliever it is hard to say the Royals completely boffed the pick.  Being drafted in the first round is not a guarantee of success.  And it isn&#039;t as though the Royals reached well outside the conventional wisdom to take Crow at 11th (or 12th, or whatever).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, Grant Green.  And I think his stock has fallen a bit, right?  Anyway, point is, Crow was well regarded at the time of the draft, and even if he ends up a reliever it is hard to say the Royals completely boffed the pick.  Being drafted in the first round is not a guarantee of success.  And it isn&#8217;t as though the Royals reached well outside the conventional wisdom to take Crow at 11th (or 12th, or whatever).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted</title>
		<link>http://www.royalsauthority.com/?p=4832&#038;cpage=1#comment-12358</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 19:27:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.royalsauthority.com/?p=4832#comment-12358</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Clark, I was thinking of Gibson too, but with his previous arm injury and now Tommy John, I wonder how durable a pitcher he is going to be.  Miller I am unfamiliar with.  Trout, yes, pretty much everyone wishes they had taken him.  Maybe Nick Green from that draft would have been a good pick too (is that right, Nick Green?, Oakland shortstop?).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clark, I was thinking of Gibson too, but with his previous arm injury and now Tommy John, I wonder how durable a pitcher he is going to be.  Miller I am unfamiliar with.  Trout, yes, pretty much everyone wishes they had taken him.  Maybe Nick Green from that draft would have been a good pick too (is that right, Nick Green?, Oakland shortstop?).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
