Royals Authority

Deconstructing The Process

I’ll be honest, I don’t have an opinion on the new name of the Royals’ Triple-A affiliate.   My only real opinion is that I don’t like teams changing names, be it good or bad, and as such the new Omaha Stormchasers is nothing that gets me excited.

What does get me excited, however, is the Omaha team’s possible lineup next April.   Perhaps as much as anything else, it will represent just how much potential progress the Royals’ organization has made under Dayton Moore.

After years of being the depository of has-beens, almosts and never-weres, the Omaha Royals/Stormchasers are going to offer a somewhat breathtaking array of talent when they take the field next April.   Gone are the days of Brian Buchanan, Gookie Dawkins, Seth Etherton and Brandon Duckworth (all fine humans, I’m sure, but not exactly the solution to any major league problem that might arise during a season).   Instead, the Stormchasers might well roll out this lineup when they open up in their new stadium next spring:

Derrick Robinson, CF

Johnny Giavotella, 2B

Mike Moustakas, 3B

Eric Hosmer, 1B

Clint Robinson, DH

David Lough, RF

Paulo Orlando, LF

Jeff Bianchi, SS

Manny Pina, C

It may be a stretch to have Bianchi at shortstop that early, but he should figure into the mix at some point.   It is also possible that David Lough could well open 2011 in Kansas City, but for now we will start him off in Omaha.

When you couple this lineup with what is likely to be a bullpen stocked with near major league ready homegrown talent (Louis Coleman, Blaine Hardy, et.al.) and a starting rotation which at some point will include Mike Montgomery, Danny Duffy, John Lamb and Chris Dwyer (maybe even Aaron Crow), it will be hard to resist making a trek or two to Omaha in 2011.

While the organizational pitching depth is near legendary status at this point, the real positive about the Omaha roster next season is the position players who are not on it.

Just a rung below, we are likely to see Wil Myers (be it at catcher or in the outfield), middle infielder of the near future Christian Colon and catching prospect Salvador Perez.   When is the last time you could look at the AA and AAA batting orders and say with some degree of confidence that there were five or six future major league regulars playing?

2011 might well be a tough year to be a Kansas City Royals’ fan, but if you can tolerate the new name, it will be a fun year to be a fan of the Stormchasers.

This is the latest post in this series reviewing the Kansas City Royals offensively, position by position.  You can go back and read the posts on catcher (including a series preview),  first base, second base and third base.

First, let’s take a look at some of the players who played shortstop and how they hit while they played the position.

Willie Bloomquist got one game at short and Mike Aviles got thirteen, but the real story of the position is Yuniesky Betancourt.  Betancourt played the position day after day and he was never put in any other spot.  The numbers that we’ll see below come almost exclusively from Yuniesky, so he’s the one guys stats above.  The case of Betancourt is extremely interesting.  His existence on the team is representative of so many different things depending on who you ask.  Some people will tell you that he represents the absolute failure of Dayton Moore at the Major League level.  Others believe he is representative of the absolute trainwreck that the shortstop position has been for the Royals.  Still others will tell you he’s one of the best players on the team and and they’ll be countered with arguments that are nearly the polar opposite.  Those discussions will rage on as long as he’s on the team, and they’ve been analyzed at this site as well.  So, let’s just try and look at the numbers without the bias of our feelings towards the Yunigma.

One thing you can say is that Betancourt was durable.  He played 151 games at a position which gets a lot of work during a season.  Sometimes I forget about the durability issue with players, and I think that as a whole we underrate it.  The ability to stay healthy, whether it’s luck, conditioning or some combination could be in my mind the 6th tool for a baseball player.  Beyond durability, Yuniesky showed decent homerun totals for a shortstop by mashing 16 bombs.  He still doesn’t get on base at a rate which is respectable, and the combination of a burst of power and his lack of getting on base translated into an average offensive shortstop.    Lets see how the Royals shorstops compared to the rest of the league.

Clearly, with 151 of 162 games Yuniesky’s numbers mirror those of the entire Royals shortstop corps.  The numbers rank right about in the middle, not spectacular but not terrible.    What’s odd are that the very stark differences in the Royals numbers with those surrounding them.  Yuniesky is an extreme hitter, which makes the extreme as well.    The Royals shortstops had the lowest strikeout rate in the AL (shocked me), and the second lowest walk rate (didn’t shock me).  That clearly translated into a low OBP (11th) and an ok batting average (8th), but the one skill which propelled the Royals to the middle of the pack was the SLG (4th).

I’d imagine even the most die-hard Yuni supporter will admit that the power he showed in 2010 was likely an aberration, and therefore unsustainable.  The Royals are on the hook for $1.62m to Yuniesky in 2011, so it’s an almost certainty that barring injury he gets nearly the same number of games in 2011 that he got in 2010.  Mike Aviles’ arm has likely fully healed from his Tommy John surgery and could pick up some more time at SS as the Royals attempt to work out the third base and second base situations.  Christian Colon was drafted in the first round in 2010 and had a solid debut in his first professional season.  He’s unlikely to be ready to play in 2011, but he could be in the mix for 2012.

I admit, there is something nice about a regular contributor at shortstop who can hit for some power and who can play every day.  I don’t believe that Yuniesky is anything more than a stop-gap and what happens in the post-Yunigma era will be a very important decision for Dayton Moore.

Today is zero hour for the Royals to set their 40-man roster ahead of the upcoming Rule 5 draft.

The rules for the Rule 5 draft are fairly straight forward and simple.  Players eligible for the Rule 5 draft include those who were signed at age 19 and older and have been with a team for four years, and those who were signed at 18 or younger and have been with their team for five years.

Complicating matters for the Royals leading up to the deadline is the fact they are a young organization.  Players eligible for the draft are college players selected in Dayton Moore’s first draft. (For clarification, I’m calling 2007 as GMDM’s first draft.)  When you have a team as stacked in the minors as the Royals are it creates quite the conundrum.

Further complicating matters is the fact the Royals still have… let’s be nice and say they have issues when it comes to acquiring players to fill out their roster.   Case in point:  this month they claimed Joaquin Arias off waivers from the New York Mets.  Not a great claim, but the Royals felt they needed a backup in the middle infield.  Fine.  Except then they claimed Lance Zawadzki from the San Diego Padres.  Basically, the same player – a utility middle infielder who isn’t good enough to hold down a regular role on a half-decent team.

So now, through the magic of two waiver claims, the Royals have filled two spots on their 40-man roster with what we will call surplus.  They don’t really need either one of these guys and they certainly don’t need both.

Then there’s the fact the Royals are mindful of the future.  In other words, we all expect Mike Moustakas to make his debut at some point in the 2011 season.  Because he’s not eligible for the Rule 5 draft, there’s no reason to put him on the 40-man roster at this point.  Still, if the Royals do bring him to Kansas City at some point next summer, they will need to clear a spot for him on the 40-man.

The Royals won’t want to place a player on the 40-man roster now and then have to remove him during the season.  There’s a much better chance for a player to be claimed off waivers than to be selected in the Rule 5 draft.

It’s a complicated process.  Dayton Moore has said he will protect three to five players.  Here’s who I think the Royals protect.

Everett Teaford – Since teams have to keep players selected in the Rule 5 on their 25-man roster during the season, these drafts feature a run on pitching.  It’s basically easier to bury a pitcher at the back end of a bullpen, that to keep a bat on what has typically become a very thin bench.  Of all the Royals pitchers eligible for the draft, Teaford is the best of the bunch.  He threw 99 innings last summer for Northwest Arkansas and posted a 3.36 ERA and featured a strikeout rate of 10.3 SO/9.  His control was exceptional as well, with a walk rate of 2.9 BB/9.

He’s an automatic add to the 40-man roster.

Clint Robinson – This one is questionable.  He turns 26 in February and has yet to progress past Double-A.  Except this summer in Northwest Arkansas all the guy did was hit .335/.410/.625 while winning the Texas League triple crown.  As a first baseman, he’s sandwiched between Billy Butler and Kila Ka’aihuie in the majors and Eric Hosmer in the minors.

Still, his monster year in AA was too good to ignore.

David Lough – Lough has been compared to David DeJesus and with DeJesus gone, now is Lough’s chance to show us how accurate those comparisons are.  A little speed, modest power and the ability to make contact does make him sound like DeJesus version 2.0.  Last year he hit .280/.346/.437 for Omaha, so he’s basically ready to make the move for to the majors.  You don’t leave players this close to the majors unprotected.  Someone will take him.  Plus, with the current roster thin on outfielders, there’s a chance he will open the season as a starter.

Another automatic choice.

That’s it.  Those are my three.  That means three must go.  I leave players like Derrick Robinson and Paulo Orlando exposed.  Those guys won’t be drafted as they’re marginal major league players at this point in their careers.  Same for pitchers Eduardo Paulino and Mario Santiago.  Their skill sets won’t translate well to the majors at this point in their respective careers.

Fortunately, even though the Royals needlessly added a pair of utility infielders, there’s still plenty of fat to trim off this roster.

I think Gaby Hernandez is gone for sure.  Once upon a time he dominated in the lower minors, but as he progressed he started catching too much of the plate and became incredibly hittable.  He’s one the wrong side of the fringe.

Victor Marte has done well in Triple-A, but has been absolutely battered in a pair of turns in the majors.  The guy just doesn’t miss enough bats and doesn’t have the stuff to survive in the major leagues.

Then there’s a coin flip between Bryan Bullington and Phillip Humber.  I think one of these guys will go.  The one who remains will get a shot at the back end of the Royals rotation.  Or perhaps in the bullpen as a swingman.

Those are my choices.  Get in early and leave yours in the comments.

Episode #036 – Royals Authority writer Craig Brown joins Nick in this episode of the podcast.  They talk about Dejesus, Upton, Greinke, the Storm Chasers, Sporting KC and how Clark is totally blowing it if he doesn’t see baseball in Puerto Rico.  All that plus some other random musings on the Royals and baseball.

:http://www.livekc.com/podcasts/bbs036.mp3|titles=BBS

Follow Nick on Twitter @brokenbatsingle or on Facebook

Follow Craig on Twitter @royalsauthority

Music used in this podcast:

The Replacements – I Will Dare

Sir Richard Bishop – Zurvan

How to Get the Podcast:

Click here to be taken to the site to download directly.

Subscribe via iTunes

Subscribe via Zune

Subscribe via any other feedreader.

Nick Scott writes about the Royals for Royals Authority, podcasts about the Royals at Broken Bat Single and writes about the Chiefs for Chiefs Command. You can follow him on Twitter @brokenbatsingle, on Facebook or email him at brokenbatsingle at gmail dot com.

As you probably know, I’m a John Buck fan.  By “fan,” I mean I really would have liked for the Royals to keep him over Miguel Olivo last winter and avoided signing Jason Kendall.  Buck is an adequate backstop with power.  There’s some value in that.  Yesterday, we learned exactly how much value as he signed a three-year, $18 million contract with the Florida Marlins.

Come again?

Just when you think you have baseball economics figured out, someone comes along and just blasts the conventional wisdom right out of the water.  As much as I like Buck, I always thought him to play out the rest of his career as kind of a journeyman… A series of single year deals that would pay him somewhere in the neighborhood of $2 or $3 million per.  But a multi-year commitment that will net him $6 million a year?  Wow.

And now we can say we knew him when.  Unfortunately, he’s now in South Florida.  Baseball’s Siberia.

The Buck news (and subsequent insane Dan Uggla deal) pushed the potential big rumor of the day to the back pages of the internet. (I know… mixed metaphor alert.)  Allegedly, the Arizona Diamondbacks have a bit of buyers remorse on Justin Upton and are listening to offers for their outfielder.  Upton hit .273/.356/.422 in 571 plate appearances – numbers down from his stellar 2009 campaign where he hit .300/.366/.532 in roughly the same number of plate appearances.

Whomever deals for Upton (assuming the Diamondbacks are serious and actually pull the trigger) will be getting a 23 year old outfielder who is signed through 2015 and is owed roughly $49 million.  And is likely a bargain.

This presents an interesting question if you’re Royals general manager Dayton Moore.  Upton is an A List talent locked in to what should be a very favorable contract, so as such, he will demand an A List return.  The Royals have the players at their disposal to make the deal.  We know how their minor league system is stocked to the gills with young, promising talent.

So the question is, do the Royals partially disassemble their minor league system by dealing a couple of their top prospects in exchange for a young outfielder who has proven he can hit in the major leagues?  Do you ship potential in exchange for a player who has proven he can perform at the major league level?

What would it take?  Two top ten prospects?  An arm and a bat? If that’s the case, I think I pull the trigger.    Sure the trade could backfire for a number of reasons (injury by Upton, both prospects become All-Stars, etc.) but in the cases where you can deal potential for proven ability – especially when the player with proven ability is only 23 – you kind of have to do it.

However, if Dayton Moore doesn’t want to ship off a pair of his prized prospects, there’s an alternative…

How about shipping Zack Greinke to Arizona along with another mid-level prospect in exchange for Upton?

Think about that one for a moment… (Although I can hear the chorus of “Hell, yeahs!” all the way from my mom’s basement.)

Greinke has publicly called into question his desire to remain in Kansas City for another youth movement.  He has a limited no-trade clause that we know blocks deals to large market teams, presumably because he doesn’t want to pitch under the microscope that comes with playing for a team like the Yankees, Red Sox or Phillies.  The Royals are in a payroll conscious frame of mind and swapping a $12 million salary for the $11 million Upton is due over the next two seasons seems like something that would appeal to the Royal bean counters.

Of course, I haven’t touched on the big reason to make the trade… Upton could become the best power hitting corner outfielder for the Royals since… Danny Tartabull?  Wow.

For Arizona this deal makes some sense as well.  Everyone needs starting pitching, but the Diamondbacks have more than a few openings.  Greinke is signed for the next two years and in the topsy-turvy NL West, all it takes is some stability to be in the race.  Greinke wouldn’t automatically make them a contender, but he would certainly move them closer.  Besides, think about him taking a few turns in San Francisco and San Diego a couple of times a year.  (Even at home… Those are traditionally a pair of weak-hitting teams.)  Greinke could move to Arizona and pull a Lincecum and win back to back Cy Young awards.

If I’m Dayton Moore, I’m kicking the tires on Upton and thinking of sending Greinke on his way to the desert.  If Arizona is amenable, I’d make this trade in a heartbeat.

If they do make a deal like this, it would seem to accelerate the timetable, wouldn’t it?  Even though Upton would be here until 2015, the Royals would need to move their prospects along to where a majority of them would have to make their debuts in 2012.  (Regardless, this is likely to happen – I’m thinking an Upton deal would really push their hand.)  You figure the young nucleus of hitters and especially the pitchers will need a couple years of major league seasoning before the Royals can seriously consider themselves contenders.  That means a playoff push could happen in 2014, which means we would have two years of in-his-prime Upton to complement the young, developing, championship players.

You will hear no argument from me.

I am going to take a break from my normal routine here and pause the positional season in review posts I’ve been putting up.  To be honest, the main reason is because I’ve been very sick and my brain is only at about a quarter capacity.  Instead for my regular Tuesday installment, I am going to just do some bullets and notes from around the Royals and baseball.  When you’re sick, it’s always best to let other people do most of the heavy lifting.  So let’s just get right into it.

  • First, let’s start with some tone setting music, John Zorn’s Electric Masada – Kairaim Part 1 and Part 2.
  • It’s not Royals related, but in a way it’s Kansas City related.  John Klima at Baseball Beginnings writes The Last .400 Hitter, about Artie Wilson who hit .402 in the Negro American League.  Also, if you are not, you should consider becoming a member of the Negro League Museum.
  • The Royals named Lonnie Goldberg the new Director of Scouting.  The title of the article was “Goldberg named new KC director of scouting” and I’m not gonna lie, I was like “wow, Joel Goldberg is getting out of the TV game?”  Lonnie Goldberg has been with the Royals since 2007 and was the director of baseball operations.
  • I found this to be hilarious.  I know that the likely audience of people who would enjoy pitch f/x comedy is small, but I am in that small group.
  • Jeff Zimmerman at Royals Review asks David Glass to vote for Marvin Miller for the Hall of Fame.  I agree 100%.
  • The Omaha Royals have been re-named the Omaha Storm Chasers.  Yes, seriously.  I expected to read Minda Haas ripping it apart, but she’s not.  I’ll defer to her on this and accept it.
  • Todd Gold of Perfect Game has a scouting report from the AFL Rising Stars game at Royals Prospects.  I came away from the game thinking that Mike Montgomery had electric stuff, but needed to be more consistent.  However it was only two innings.
    .
  • Phil Wood of MASN writes “I was told by someone privy to the situation that there indeed have been preliminary discussions between the Nationals and the Royals regarding righthander Zack Greinke.” He goes on to say “As the story goes, K.C. GM Dayton Moore…believes that any Nationals’ package would have to begin with either pitcher Jordan Zimmerman or shortstop Ian Desmond.” To be honest, I don’t know a whole lot about either of these guys.  What do you think?
    .
  • Baseball America has posted their Top 10 Royals prospects.  They agree with me and have Eric Hosmer at the top.  Brett Eibner the 2010 draft pick out of the University of Arkansas is number 10, he’ll be someone to keep an eye on in 2011 along with Salvador Perez.
  • Clark and I discussed the David Dejesus trade in detail on the podcast last week, but I never got to write down my thoughts.  The questions come down to these:

1. Is this good return for Dejesus? It’s hard to tell, and we won’t know until time has passed. But the Royals are giving up only one season of a corner outfielder without power who is coming off of a season ending hand injury. The needed return for that isn’t extremely high.
2. Why did it happen so early? I figure Dayton Moore has been trying to deal Dejesus for a year now and has a pretty good idea of what his value on the market is. While it’s early in the off-season, its not early in the Dejesus talks.

  • Former Royal Ed Kirkpatrick died on Monday. He was 66.  He was a member of the original 1969 Royals and was on the team until he was traded in 1973 with Winston Cole and Kurt Bevacqua to the Pirates for Nelson Briles and Fernando Gonzalez.

Nick Scott writes about the Royals for Royals Authority, podcasts about the Royals at Broken Bat Single and writes about the Chiefs for Chiefs Command. You can follow him on Twitter @brokenbatsingle, on Facebook or email him at brokenbatsingle at gmail dot com.

Player development is anything but an exact science.   Individual players, just like individuals in general, all have subtle and not so subtle differences in their histories and personalities that effect what and how they go through life.

In baseball, it begins with simply how much you played the game as an amateur, at what level and against what sort of competition.   By the very quirks of a given region, a good right handed hitter coming out of high school might be able to count the number of left handed pitchers they had faced on one hand.    A college junior might have moved seamlessly from rec league to club league to high school to college and never hit less than .350 in his life, only to step in against some seventeen year old punk in the Low A ball that throws harder than anyone he has ever faced.

As a general manager, you likely have an idea as to when your high draft picks might make the majors, but one can never be sure when what seems like a realistic timeline gets blown to bits by a never before encountered one for forty streak that suddenly makes an ultra-confident young player feel very fallible.

In a roundabout way, that brings us to the Royals’ Mike Moustakas.   Greg Holland was the first Dayton Moore draftee to make the big leagues, but Moustakas is the first name prospect that is going to get there.   The question is simply, when?

Given that player development is inexact in nature, I did some pretty inexact research into this area.   Very simply, I reviewed the player development history of the majority of the 2010 third basemen.    Those that were college draftees like Ryan Zimmerman and Evan Longoria were sorted out, as were players who were shortstops coming up (A-Rod, Jhonny Peralta, etc.) and guys that were simply kind of oddities (I’m looking at you Jose Bautista).   That left us with a group of either high school draftees or Latin American free agents signed as teenagers.

Let’s take a look at that list and the time they spent in the minors:

  • Adrian Beltre.   My feeble recollection is that Beltre might have been signed at the age of fifteen, but his American professional career began at age seventeen.   Beltre played 154 games in A ball over two seasons before moving to AA to start 1998.  He appeared in 64 games at that level before debuting with the Dodgers in June and has been a major leaguer ever since.
  • Scott Rolen.   Yes, long ago, Scott Rolen was young.   He appeared in 25 rookie league games after signing out of high school, 204 at A ball and 81 more at AA.   After 45 games in AA, Rolen got the call and, like Beltre, has been in the majors since that time.
  • David Wright.   The Mets had an interesting plan with Wright.   They started slow with David, giving him 36 rookie league games and 168 more in A ball.   In 2004, however, Wright began the season in AA (60 games), played 30 more in AAA and was in the majors by July.   That would be a very close developmental equivalent to Mike Moustakas having made his major league debut last summer.
  • Pablo Sandoval.   The Round Mound of Pound (c’mon, deep down you all like to say that, don’t you?), played 46 rookie league games and then 287 in A ball.  Sandoval then moved to AA for 44 games and then to the majors in August of 2008.
  • Aramis Ramirez.   He went straight to A ball, where Aramis stayed for 204 games.   Skipping AA entirely, Ramirez then played 222 games in AAA before sticking the majors for good.
  • Chipper Jones.   Ah, this is the name you were wondering about wasn’t it?   Jones say action in 44 rookie league games, 136 A ball contests and 67 more in AA.   He got a cup of major league coffee in September of 1993, but played in 139 AAA games the following year before becoming a fixture in the Atlanta lineup.

Now, compare those game totals to that of Mike Moustakas.    After 11 rookie league games late in 2007, Mike played in 255 A ball games over the next two season.  Last year, he dominated AA for 66 games and then moved onto AAA Omaha for 52 more contests.   That is a total of 384 minor league games, two less than Chipper Jones played in.

Of the six players reviewed above, Adrian Beltre was the quickest to the majors (218 games), while Aramis Ramirez took the longest (426 games).   Ramirez and Chipper Jones were the only two to spend more than a couple of months in AAA.   All these players, like Moustakas, spent close to two seasons in A ball and from there, with the exception of Ramirez, vaulted pretty quickly into the majors.

As I indicated above, six players does not a thorough study make, but it does show a bit of a precedent in that six different organizations at different points in time decided that somewhere this side of 400 games was enough seasoning for a highly thought of third base prospect.

With Moustakas, of course, the Royals have some contractual time lines to consider as well.   Delaying his major league debut until June would like save them a year of arbitration with Moustakas and buy another season before Mike would be eligible for free agency.   That kind of talk is annoying to be sure, but a valid consideration for a team that is not going anywhere in 2011.

All the above considered, it might well be that the overriding consideration with Moustakas might well be at what point the Royals believe they can bring him up and not have Mike become a ‘Super-Two’ with regard to salary arbitration after the 2013 season.

Let’s face it, the Royals were not going to be a good baseball team in 2011 – with or without David DeJesus.   That does not mean I won’t miss David DeJesus, nor does it mean that I understand this trade.

Nick and I discussed DeJesus at length on last night’s podcast and pretty much summed up his legacy in Kansas City in one word: ‘unappreciated’.    Sure, it would have been nice if David was a competent base stealer or hit for more power, but in the end he was without question the Royals most consistent player on the roster from the middle of 2004 until his season came to an end last July in New York.

In 876 games with the Royals, David compiled a career line of .289/.360/.427 with an OPS+ of 108.   According to Fangraphs, DeJesus was 18.3 wins above replacement level during that time.   Those numbers were almost rock solid year to year.    You could plug DeJesus in your lineup and know exactly what you were going to get each and every year.

There was a lot of crap spouted from people who should know better that ‘DeJesus was a fourth outfielder on a contending team’ that was just flat out wrong.   I have written at least three articles over time on the subject and I don’t remember finding more than one contending team that had THREE outfielders better than DeJesus.

David DeJesus was a good player, not an All-Star, not Carlos Beltran and it would have been nice if he was a step faster or tad stronger, but in the end he was major league regular with above average skills….on any team in the league, not just the Royals.

That said, trading DeJesus is not a bad plan.    He is going to turn thirty-one next month and was going to cost the Royals $6 million this season.    David was coming off a thumb injury, which can do funny things to a hitter.   One could make the case that DeJesus might struggle for a couple months coming back from the injury and reduce his trade value at the deadline this coming July.  

It was also very possible that DeJesus could come back one hundred percent on Opening Day, build on his successful 2010 and have a great season on a bad team and leave for bigger money and more years.  

So, there were reasons for trading David DeJesus, but you wonder why Dayton Moore was in such a rush to do so.   Several scenarios come to mind:

  • Dayton Moore likes to make an early trade.    We all have ways of doing things that may or may not make sense and during his time as GM, Moore has shown a tendency to want to leap out of the off-season gate.
  • Money, money, money.   This trade saves the Royals roughly $5.5 million in 2011.   That is money that might be earmarked for arbitration eligible players, maybe a move in the free agent market (cringe) or simply sent to the bottom line where it will hopefully be stashed for future contracts.
  • Vin Mazzaro throws from the right side.   The big names in the Royals’ system, the future saviors of the starting rotation, are mainly lefthanders.   Could it be that Mazzaro, who at age twenty-four has under 600 minor league innings and 150 major league innings on his resume, is about to blossom into a middle of the rotation righthander to break up the lefties soon to arrive?
  • There really, really is a plan.   Almost every move Dayton Moore has made has always seemed to be the first of what surely will be several corresponding moves.     In reality, there have been no corresponding moves, but maybe this time there really will be.

Last night, Nick asked me to rate this trade on a scale of 1 to 10 and I called it a ‘five’.   Having DeJesus in the outfield in 2011 was not going to make the Royals contenders.    Having Mazzaro in the rotation and Marks in the minors is not going to make them contenders in 2011, either, but it could help them be one in 2012 or 2013.

You would have liked to received a more established player coming back in exchange for DeJesus or at least given the market some time to truly establish his trade value.     All things being equal, I would have been inclined to wait for losers in the Carl Crawford and Jayson Werth bidding to at least kick the tires on DeJesus.

While it is very possible this move was more financially driven than anything else, you would like to think there is a grander scheme at play here.   That this trade is the first in a series of roster moves designed to make the Royals possible contenders in 2012 instead of 2013 or 2014.    You would like to think that this deal is more than just hopingthat Vin Mazzaro becomes a good major league starter.

Episode #034 – Clark Fosler, one of my co-writers at Royals Authority joins me to talk about the David Dejesus trade.  What does it mean for the Royals, did the Royals get good value in return and did Dayton rush to judgment?  We also talk 2011 and beyond.

:http://www.livekc.com/podcasts/bbs035.mp3|titles=BBS

Follow Nick on Twitter @brokenbatsingle or on Facebook
Follow Clark on Twitter @cfosroyalsauth

Music used in this podcast:

Tool – Lateralus

Earthless – Cherry Red

The Hipnecks – Sni-A-Bar Stomp

How to Get the Podcast:

Click here to be taken to the site to download directly.

Subscribe via iTunes

Subscribe via Zune

Subscribe via any other feedreader.

Nick Scott writes about the Royals for Royals Authority, podcasts about the Royals at Broken Bat Single and writes about the Chiefs for Chiefs Command. You can follow him on Twitter @brokenbatsingle, on Facebook or email him at brokenbatsingle at gmail dot com.

I have to admit, I felt a great deal of relief when it was announced Billy Butler had been selected as the Royals Player of the Year.  Usually, I could give a damn about these awards. However, this year part of me was frightened there could be a ground swell of support for the Yunigma.  After all the Royals PR department did during the year to promote his RBI and the fact he did tie for the team lead with 16 home runs… Honestly, this is like the Doomsday Scenario.  It would have been Mark Redman, All-Star kind of bad.

Butler won for the second consecutive year, and it was deserving.  He became only the second Royal to ever win the award back to back. (George Brett did it twice, naturally.)  In fact, looking ahead to 2011, I would put money on Butler doing something not even the great Brett could accomplish – threepeat.

Speaking of the future, when Butler was on a conference call with the media, the discussion turned to the potential of him signing a long-term deal to stay in Kansas City.  It’s the perfect time for the topic to come up, since Butler is eligible for arbitration for the first time this winter.

In Dutton’s article in the KC Star, Butler acknowledged there had been some talk about his future with the club

“In spring training last year,” he said, “there were some talks, but they kind of slowed down. My only wish was that when the season started, I wanted to be focused on baseball.

“Obviously, if the right deal is there, I’d be more than happy to (sign). This (club) is all I’ve ever known, and I don’t want to change. I’m comfortable, and I want to see this team win in Kansas City. I wouldn’t like to go anywhere else.”
We all know how the last couple of sentences will play in our town.  (He likes us! He really, really likes us!)  Kansas Citians love players who love them back.  We celebrated this last week with Joakim Soria who announced his love for the organization.  And some of us vilified Zack Greinke when he said he didn’t want to stick around for another youth movement.

Given that we know Butler would like to stay, let’s try to separate emotion from reality and put on our general manager caps for a moment.

Does it make sense for the Royals to give Butler a contract extension.

Pros:
— Money.
You can keep Butler in the fold for one or two years past what would be his initial entry into free agency.  (He’s scheduled to be a free agent following the 2013 season.)  Butler has proved he can be a quality player in the major leagues and he could potentially become an All-Star with the bat.  Guys like this don’t come cheap, so you better get him while you can lock him into a discount.

– Youth. Butler turns 25 a couple of weeks after Opening Day.  If the Royals sign him to a long-term deal, they can lock him up at least until he turns 30.

– Professional hitter. Butler is just a pure hitter. In 2010, the guy cut his strikeout rate from 15.3% the previous season to 11.5%.  He bumped his walk rate from 8.6% to 10.2%.  That fueled a 26 point jump in his OBP.

He hits a line drive 18% of the time he puts the ball in play and he’s just a doubles machine.  His 96 doubles from the last two seasons is the most in the majors.  On a team strapped for power, that counts for something.

The Royals offense has been horrible the last several years.  Last season, they scored an average of 4.17 runs per game. I shudder to think how low that number would have been if they had someone like the departed Ross Gload or Mike Jacobs in the lineup instead of Butler.

Cons:
— Absence of power development.
Despite hitting 45 doubles in 2010, Butler lost 23 points off his slugging percentage and 40 points of his isolated power. (ISO)  Ever since I started writing about Butler I’ve been preaching the gospel of the upper cut in the swing.  The guy is simply a solid line drive hitter (which is outstanding – he has a career .325 BABIP because he has an 18% line drive rate) but his margin for error lies not in the fly ball, but in the grounder.  In other words, when he misses by that tiniest fraction of an inch, it’s because he’s over the ball and not under.

The result is a GB/FB ratio that is rock steady.

2007 – 1.43
2008 – 1.41
2009 – 1.37
2010 – 1.40

If I asked you to look at the above ratios and tell me his best power year, it wouldn’t be a surprise to learn that it came in 2009 – the year when his ratio was most skewed toward the fly ball.  And that’s the issue… When I write “most skewed” were talking three hundredths of a point.  He simply has to learn to generate loft.  Unfortunately, in the course of nearly 2,200 major league plate appearances, this has yet to happen.

– Iron glove. The only way Butler will ever win a Gold Glove is if he changes his name to Derek Jeter.

OK… Butler has improved at first base with the glove.  His reflexes are pretty good for a big man.  Still, with two plus years of Ultimate Zone Rating data at our disposal, I think we can safely say Butler is never going to be average defensively.  Don’t get me wrong… It’s awesome he’s worked so hard on his defense and he is certainly getting better.  It’s just he’s moved the needle from “Disaster” to “Solidly Below Average” when it comes to the glove.

— Tortise-like speed.
The man has been clocked with sundials.  He’s not going to get faster.  He’s going to become slower.  If that’s possible.

– The body. Butler is a big man.  And big men can be a crap shoot.  For every Jim Thome there is a Travis Hafner and Brian Giles.  Can the Royals afford to commit a high percentage of their payroll to a player who could potentially break down as he approaches and passes the age of 30?

Last year, I was all for giving Butler the extension.  This year, I’m torn.  The cons are pretty convincing if you ask me.  Plus, there’s this little matter of the Moustakas, Hosmer, Myers troika of bats tearing up the minors.  Hosmer is the future at first base, but is still probably two years away from his debut.  Those are Butler’s first two arbitration seasons.

I think it would serve the Royals and Dayton Moore well to slow play this situation.  See how Hosmer does beginning the season in Double-A with an eye to a potential move to Triple-A midway through the season.  This also gives the Royals another season to evaluate Butler, to see if he will finally develop that power stroke we have all been waiting on.  The danger in waiting is the price will certainly rise.  I’m fine with that.  Better to add a few extra millions a year late and feel good about it than to curse a backloaded contract for a broken down hitter who never developed power.

If Hosmer stays on track and arrives in Kansas City in 2013, the Royals can shift Butler to DH (although he’s been adamant about playing in the field) and then let him move on to the highest bidder.  Sure, it could be a bummer to let a quality bat depart as a free agent, but if The Process works and the Big Three in the minors are the studs we hope they will be, then you let Butler walk and sign a huge contract for some other team.

%d bloggers like this: