Prior to the 2010 season, many of us thought that the starting rotation might one of the Kansas City Royals’ strengths. With the reigning Cy Young Award winner heading the staff and a healthy Gil Meche returning, it seemed that the Royals would have a one-two punch on par with anyone in the division.
Behind Greinke and Meche, there was a very reasonable chance that Luke Hochevar would take the next step and become a reliable number three starter while Brian Bannister was likely to remain a serviceable number four starter. Plus, maybe this was the year that it all came together for Kyle Davies. Even if Davies continued as he had been, he was still just the number five starter, anyway.
Well so much for that…
At our annual Royals Authority winter meetings in Bora Bora, we discussed that Zack Greinke’s ERA could go up an entire run and he still could be the best pitcher in the American League. At the same time, we doubted that Zack would regress that much. As it turned out, Zack’s ERA has gone up by just under two runs this year and while he is still a force to be reckoned with, Greinke is not dominating as he did in 2009.
That said, Zack is hardly the major issue with the Royals’ rotation. Gil Meche started all of nine games and now, if he ever pitches again as a Royal, will do so out of the bullpen. Luke Hochevar, who had shown signs of progress, was sat down for ‘a start or two’ on June 12th and has not been seen since. Brian Bannister is currently sporting an ERA of barely under six and Kyle Davies remains Kyle Davies.
How bad has it been for the rotation this year? Well, Bruce Chen, who found no takers for his services over the winter is arguably…not even arguably..IS the team’s number two starter and recently acquired Sean O’Sullivan, who has been tagged for 11 runs in 16 innings of work seems like an improvement over Bannister and Davies.
Of course, as I have often written, the end result of 2010 is not so important as building this team for the future. In that respect, the Royals have plenty to look forward to when it comes to the rotation. The AA level of the system boasts Mike Montgomery, John Lamb, Danny Duffy and Chris Dwyer – all potential Top 100 prospects by the time those rankings come out this winter. Behind them is disappointing, but still talented, Aaron Crow, who is joined by another slew of good young arms in Tim Melville, Tyler Sample, Brian Paukovits and Will Smith. The system is positively bubbling with potential major league starters.
Here’s the bad news: if you throw out Crow’s 119 innings of work at Northwest Arkansas and Will Smith’s bizarre trip through three levels of the Angels’ system this season, the rest of the guys we just named COMBINED, have 60 innings of experience above A ball. That’s no one’s fault, just a result of some minor injuries, a two month ‘retirement’ and the simple fact that these pitchers are all very young.
Sixty innings of combined AA experience makes it highly unlikely that we see any of these hurlers in Kansas City before September of 2011. That bodes well for the rotation in 2012 and beyond, but it doesn’t do much for next year’s starting five.
Here is what we know about the 2011 rotation: Zack Greinke will be the number one starter and Gil Meche won’t be in it.
Chances are, and given the Royals’ recent performance/luck at getting major league starting pitchers healthy, it is just a chance, Luke Hochevar will be in the rotation, too. Before he went down in June, Luke had shaved over a run and one-half off his 2009 ERA (and yes, I think ERA is still a decent if somewhat crude measurement of the effectiveness of a starting pitcher) and gone six or more innings in nine of his thirteen starts. Should Hochevar make it back for even just a handful of starts yet this season, we could once more make a reasonable assumption that he might be able to take that ‘next step’ and settle in as a legitimate number three or number four starter.
After that, the Royals’ options to fill out the rotation are Bruce Chen, Brian Bannister, Sean O’Sullivan and, sigh, Kyle Davies.
Chen’s a guy that will be interesting to watch the rest of the year. After moving into the rotation, Bruce allowed 16 earned runs in his first 39 innings, but has been tagged for 20 runs in his last 25 innings. That is a bad trend, which if not reversed means Chen is not a realistic option in 2011.
Bannister’s performance has degraded to the point that the Royals are skipping his next turn in the rotation. Getting skipped in a rotation that includes Chen, O’Sullivan and Davies is not exactly a good trend, either. I don’t know what you do with Bannister, I really don’t. He is pretty much posting the worst numbers of his career across the board and getting worse as the season goes on.
Kyle Davies now has 641 innings on his major league resume and they pretty much all look the same. He is not horrible – well, not in comparison to Bannister or that guy who was wearing Gil Meche’s jersey earlier this year – but he is not anywhere near good, either. Frankly, I think you could put Kyle’s game logs for the last couple of seasons next to those of Odalis Perez during his Royals’ career and not be able to tell them apart. I don’t really view that as a ringing endorsement.
That brings us to Sean O’Sullivan, whose best asset at the moment is that he is just 22 years old. What we have seen out of Sean to date is in line with what the scouting reports indicated: a competitor, decent stuff and control, lacks a true out pitch and loses effectiveness the second and third time through a batting order. As many have pointed out, O’Sullivan is not the picture of physical conditioning, so it may be a case of simply maturing and getting in better shape. Frankly, I like O’Sullivan and could see him developing into a real number four starter (i.e. better than Bannister or Davies), but that might just be the ‘we always like the new guy syndrome’ at work there.
The options in AAA right now are pretty much Philip Humber, Gaby Hernandez and Edgar Osuna. Of the three, Osuna is intriguing, having pitched extremely well in AA with a 2.95 ERA and a 1.162 WHIP. He was pounced on pretty good in his first AAA start, but is worth watching in August. If Chen or Bannister continue to crumble or Ned Yost just gets as bored with Kyle Davies as I am, it might be worth three or four starts in September to get a feel for what Osuna has to offer.
So, what do you do in 2011 if you are running the Royals? Do you hold the line, trust the process (no sarcasm intended…for once) and wait for your truly impact arms to reach the bigs in 2012? Probably that is the smart course of action.
If Greinke rebounds from simply good back to dominant, Hochevar comes back healthy and effective (yikes, that probably jinxed him right there!), O’Sullivan matures and improves and you find two guys who are this side of awful out of Osuna, Chen, Bannister and Davies, then you have an ‘okay’ rotation. I don’t think the Royals can contend with that rotation, but those thoughts might not be realistic for next season, anyway.
Now, if you cannot tolerate a season of that rotation or you believe contending is a real possibility in 2011, then one has to look to free agency. The list of free agents this off-season can be found here, and there are a number of interesting names on the list. That said, how many that are upgrades can the Royals reasonably afford?
As you can see, projecting the 2012 starting rotation will be a lot more fun than doing so for 2011. What would you do?