<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Kansas City Royals 2010 Positional Review: Right Field</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.royalsauthority.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=3365" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.royalsauthority.com/?p=3365</link>
	<description>Deconstructing The Process</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 01:09:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.royalsauthority.com/?p=3365&#038;cpage=1#comment-4089</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2010 14:39:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.royalsauthority.com/?p=3365#comment-4089</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thats a good idea andrew.  If I have some time, I&#039;ll put together a look at how positions have improved, regressed.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thats a good idea andrew.  If I have some time, I&#8217;ll put together a look at how positions have improved, regressed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew J Overton</title>
		<link>http://www.royalsauthority.com/?p=3365&#038;cpage=1#comment-4086</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew J Overton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2010 03:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.royalsauthority.com/?p=3365#comment-4086</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the explanation Nick, and yes it makes good sense.  I understand why you use it.  Interested to see the year to year differences.  Gives a good guide to look if we are improving at specific positions or regressing.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the explanation Nick, and yes it makes good sense.  I understand why you use it.  Interested to see the year to year differences.  Gives a good guide to look if we are improving at specific positions or regressing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.royalsauthority.com/?p=3365&#038;cpage=1#comment-4085</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Dec 2010 21:41:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.royalsauthority.com/?p=3365#comment-4085</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[hi andrew, yes, I did these last year at www.brokenbatsingle.com.

sops+ is explained in the catchers post.  the s stands for split in this case position.  OPS+ normalizes the OPS and puts it in a form where 100 is roughly average.  sops+ instead of taking all of the league, it just looks at that split.  so a 100 sops+ means an average right fielder if we&#039;re looking at RF, CF for CF...etc.  That way we aren&#039;t comparing catchers to third basemen offensively.  Make sense?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi andrew, yes, I did these last year at <a href="http://www.brokenbatsingle.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.brokenbatsingle.com</a>.</p>
<p>sops+ is explained in the catchers post.  the s stands for split in this case position.  OPS+ normalizes the OPS and puts it in a form where 100 is roughly average.  sops+ instead of taking all of the league, it just looks at that split.  so a 100 sops+ means an average right fielder if we&#8217;re looking at RF, CF for CF&#8230;etc.  That way we aren&#8217;t comparing catchers to third basemen offensively.  Make sense?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew J Overton</title>
		<link>http://www.royalsauthority.com/?p=3365&#038;cpage=1#comment-4084</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew J Overton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Dec 2010 21:37:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.royalsauthority.com/?p=3365#comment-4084</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That really shows you how great of a season Dejesus was having before he got hurt.  While he was healthy he was the number 3 or 4 rightfielder in the AL last season.  I wonder what kind of haul we could have gotten for him had he remained healthy.  Frenchy will be a OBP downgrade, but if he can bring up the SLG he might be an offensive wash from what the team did in the past season.  Nick, did you do positional analysis in any previous years?  Where can I read about sOPS+?  Not sure what the s means.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That really shows you how great of a season Dejesus was having before he got hurt.  While he was healthy he was the number 3 or 4 rightfielder in the AL last season.  I wonder what kind of haul we could have gotten for him had he remained healthy.  Frenchy will be a OBP downgrade, but if he can bring up the SLG he might be an offensive wash from what the team did in the past season.  Nick, did you do positional analysis in any previous years?  Where can I read about sOPS+?  Not sure what the s means.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
